
If the formation of positive reinforcement is most effective on exotic animals, why is it not used more with dogs?
My brother is an exotic animal trainer show business, and the animals are trained using only positive reinforcement. The guy who wrote the book says you can not get birds, rats, ostriches, dolphins, orcas, etc. to work for you by using force. The animal, either do not work or turn you. Marine mammals drag the trainer underwater, they do not like training. Thus, it is the only reason we still use techniques as helicoptering (feet before lifting a dog on the ground until the dog passes by, or supports), beat (as described by the Koehler method) Alpha stock (as does the selfish Cesar Millan) on dogs is that dogs forgive us and still work? And if a husband beats his wife and the wife forgives him, Is it right for the husband of beating his wife to start?
I do not know anyone who uses helicoptering, the Koehler method, etc. I do not think you can not even compare to Caesar, who works with many dogs red zone many humane societies arose because of the aggression. There is no way many of these dogs that have bitten the aggression would be shown again homeable food. Many rescues put Dog food aggression without work retraining. Many people use positive rewards and training with dogs and other animals company. Why do you think all the dog show trainers use treats to reward good behavior? Open your eyes. Your analogy of the husband and the wife has absolutely no impact when it comes to dog training. Depending on your thinking because it requires the use of building positive with her abusive husband too?
Business Writing for Engineers and Technical Professionals
|
|
£0.00 |
Tags: blog, design, presentation, productivity, tips







Leave A Reply (No comments So Far)
No comments yet